This is from the book that I’m writing, which will be titled “When Tears Can’t Save Them: How the Pro-Palestine Movement Failed to Stop a Holocaust, & How it Can Still Win.” The image above is from when a Palestine banner got forcibly taken down at a Sanders event.
BACK ON TRACK RAINER. You’ve said A LOT here but it all makes sense. All power to the workers. We must rise above reformists and defeat the powerful “anything but class” perpetual psyop!
tl;dr much of this but two things that leapt off the page was reference to sexual or gender minorities and JQ. What’s your position on your comrade Hinkle’s frequent use of the terms “faggot” and “homo”?
Someone has to grab the bull of JQ by the horns. You don’t. Just why and how does such a small ethno religious group figure so prominently in so many events and fields of endeavor?
I have no problem with being critical of someone's writing but how about presenting specific facts within a counter argument rather than presenting generalized statements that sound like they were plagiarized from the Black Book of Communism or ad hominem fallacy attacks to present your opinions?
THANKYOU. I've been writing about this stuff too and it warms my heart to see others nailing these slick bastards to the floor.
BACK ON TRACK RAINER. You’ve said A LOT here but it all makes sense. All power to the workers. We must rise above reformists and defeat the powerful “anything but class” perpetual psyop!
Thanks for a very insightful post, I can’t wait for the book. In the parlance of our time, “nuance” is apparently lost on some.
tl;dr much of this but two things that leapt off the page was reference to sexual or gender minorities and JQ. What’s your position on your comrade Hinkle’s frequent use of the terms “faggot” and “homo”?
Someone has to grab the bull of JQ by the horns. You don’t. Just why and how does such a small ethno religious group figure so prominently in so many events and fields of endeavor?
I have no problem with being critical of someone's writing but how about presenting specific facts within a counter argument rather than presenting generalized statements that sound like they were plagiarized from the Black Book of Communism or ad hominem fallacy attacks to present your opinions?