The essence of liberalism—and that’s “liberalism” as defined in its broad sense of the stage where bourgeois “freedoms” became paramount—is violence. Structural violence that can’t be ended unless liberalism itself gets defeated. It was innate to the system from its beginning, because the function of liberalism was to preserve capitalism and its extractive mechanisms following the defeat of feudalism and monarchism. Capitalism requires an impoverished class in order to survive, along with tools for preventing that disenfranchised element from resisting this system that exploits, displaces, and destroys them. So subjugation and brutality are always present under liberalism, because the socioeconomic order that liberalism was designed to reinforce is a parasitic one which entails an imbalance of power.
“Liberalism” is a propaganda term. The objective is to subjugate and exploit the masses, not to liberate them from oppression.
It’s consistent with their MO in many other forms of propaganda. “Liberalisation” and “deregulation” also generally mean stripping away protections or commonly held assets that the masses have, not freeing them.
“Liberalism” is a propaganda term. The objective is to subjugate and exploit the masses, not to liberate them from oppression.
It’s consistent with their MO in many other forms of propaganda. “Liberalisation” and “deregulation” also generally mean stripping away protections or commonly held assets that the masses have, not freeing them.
Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.
This is a great piece. Great work, comrade.
this is the dumbest shit i have ever heard. do the rooskies actually pay you to defecate this nonsense onto your blog?