Image from Tampa Bay TimesThanks for reading Rainer’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. When Marxists Speak Out wrote their recent May Day statement The Escalation of the World War Danger and the Need for a New Communist International
Is that the Party of Communists--USA? I saw a name Christopher something or other? Is that the page that isn't hacked? There is a picture of a man, woman and child on the page.
I read their statement of "inclusion" and would have nothing ever to do with that "ML" party. That "inclusive" IDPOL statement is a large, glaring problem. The very fifth column you've written about previously. There is especially one very large problematic so-called grouping under their "inclusivity" statement that is heavily corporatist and backed with the full weight of the state---proper fascism. Further, "IF" some of these groups experience so-called "discrimination" that would be in the form of individual discrimination which isn't ruling class controlled---i.e.: the working class scapegoating for being "bigots". On the contrary, one "group" of so-called persecuted minority especially is the greatest beneficiary of this liberal, idealist nonsense, therefore privileged useful idiots of the ruling class. This party will fail spectacularly since they don't even recognize this extremely anti-ML threat. It is bourgeois individualism. Not to mention the one with the corporate backing that exists only as consumer commodity is anti-science, therefore anti-materialist and anti-Marxist. Factionalism is "left-wing" communism, right? And Lenin noted it is an "infantile disorder" and was historically proven correct. Stalin also mentioned the left/right deviators as two means to the same factionalist end in support of revisionism and restoration of capitalism. IDPOL only serves ruling class interests---that is its only purpose.
The only English speaking party I have found who are not deviators are the CPGB-ML (they left the larger, so-called ML party years back and I know one issue was the bourgeois feminist ideology that was creeping in as well as several other problems.) They have written a pamphlet or two about the IDPOL problem especially the one that declares there is now a "third" type of human. They have also written about bourgeois "rights" issues not being an issue of the working class. I have seen these people destroy groups that simply leaned Marxist. Any so-called Marxist group that includes these consumerist capitalists will fail unless they do a proper member pruning that sticks to materialism at a baseline, let alone Marxist discipline to keep out IDEALISM and factionalism.
The CPGB-ML also wrote articles about the "anti-war" left and their destruction of any real anti-imperialist action in the UK. Their strict Marxist analysis might be of interest to you.
Yes, Lenin discussed "just" wars for a nation's sovereignty. Russia had no choice after years of Ukrainian Nazi cultivation (since always) by the West and NATO incursions.
Only socialism to communism gets rid of imperialism and in the US our so-called "left" are all only left liberals. There will never be mention of a just war called revolution from that crowd. They're just professional whiners and quite literally in many cases earn a living from it. There will be no decisive action to end wars as our entire existence depends on colonial extraction at this point to maintain our eroding standard of living. Bring up Marx to any of them and see the ignorant, arrogant, brainless vitriol that will be spewed at you.
Is that the Party of Communists--USA? I saw a name Christopher something or other? Is that the page that isn't hacked? There is a picture of a man, woman and child on the page.
I read their statement of "inclusion" and would have nothing ever to do with that "ML" party. That "inclusive" IDPOL statement is a large, glaring problem. The very fifth column you've written about previously. There is especially one very large problematic so-called grouping under their "inclusivity" statement that is heavily corporatist and backed with the full weight of the state---proper fascism. Further, "IF" some of these groups experience so-called "discrimination" that would be in the form of individual discrimination which isn't ruling class controlled---i.e.: the working class scapegoating for being "bigots". On the contrary, one "group" of so-called persecuted minority especially is the greatest beneficiary of this liberal, idealist nonsense, therefore privileged useful idiots of the ruling class. This party will fail spectacularly since they don't even recognize this extremely anti-ML threat. It is bourgeois individualism. Not to mention the one with the corporate backing that exists only as consumer commodity is anti-science, therefore anti-materialist and anti-Marxist. Factionalism is "left-wing" communism, right? And Lenin noted it is an "infantile disorder" and was historically proven correct. Stalin also mentioned the left/right deviators as two means to the same factionalist end in support of revisionism and restoration of capitalism. IDPOL only serves ruling class interests---that is its only purpose.
The only English speaking party I have found who are not deviators are the CPGB-ML (they left the larger, so-called ML party years back and I know one issue was the bourgeois feminist ideology that was creeping in as well as several other problems.) They have written a pamphlet or two about the IDPOL problem especially the one that declares there is now a "third" type of human. They have also written about bourgeois "rights" issues not being an issue of the working class. I have seen these people destroy groups that simply leaned Marxist. Any so-called Marxist group that includes these consumerist capitalists will fail unless they do a proper member pruning that sticks to materialism at a baseline, let alone Marxist discipline to keep out IDEALISM and factionalism.
The CPGB-ML also wrote articles about the "anti-war" left and their destruction of any real anti-imperialist action in the UK. Their strict Marxist analysis might be of interest to you.
Yes, Lenin discussed "just" wars for a nation's sovereignty. Russia had no choice after years of Ukrainian Nazi cultivation (since always) by the West and NATO incursions.
Only socialism to communism gets rid of imperialism and in the US our so-called "left" are all only left liberals. There will never be mention of a just war called revolution from that crowd. They're just professional whiners and quite literally in many cases earn a living from it. There will be no decisive action to end wars as our entire existence depends on colonial extraction at this point to maintain our eroding standard of living. Bring up Marx to any of them and see the ignorant, arrogant, brainless vitriol that will be spewed at you.