Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bose Netaji Was Right's avatar

>To understand how to turn this revolt into revolution, one must grasp the thesis of Lenin’s analysis on spontaneous uprisings. Which is that without the guidance of a communist party, such an uprising will by default be guided by the bourgeois ideas that the existing conditions have instilled within it.

As if the USSR is not merely an exceptionally long "spontaneous uprising". It even got subverted by the Cornboy and became revisionist.

Imperialist-Interest is absolute. The DPRK, unlike Yugoslavia, despite being backed by very little aside from the promise to revitalize the Korean Pine over the Japanese-Grove invasion, literally still stands to this day. China relies upon exactly 0 amount of book-worship, and has one of the most flexible and reactive parties in existence - and it still stands over book-revering states like Berlin-Wall East Germany, Yugoslavia with Tito's massive crackdowns against Anti-Imperialist Reaction from Croatians, and the USSR.

If a state like the Socialist Republic of Vietnam can outlast the USSR, there clearly is a problem with the USSR model of revolution - a model whereby settler-colonial relations in Russia SSR are maintained, and the system only undergoing "violent reform", rather than actual Anti-Imperialist revolution like in the PRC.

The exact same can be said for the Black Panther Party. The Capitalists cut the head off and bribed the followers with Imperialist-superprofits. Now, there is no longer a Black Panther Party. Black Panthers, BLM, and the Black Ethnonationalists are really just three sides of the same coin, in that they can be run by whatever ideals, but will inevitably tend towards getting their followers bribed by the Imperialist Man, and will then abandon their cause and become a Dumbocrat-Voter who drop bombs in the Middle-East.

The US itself, like the Black Panthers, was founded on ideals significantly different than what they are in its current form. It was founded on Petit-Bourgeois supremacy, the complete absence of National Bourgeoisie, the so-called "abstaining from colonization" (at least outside of the Americas), Free Speech, and the Right to Bear Arms, States' Rights, etc. It was even pro-Islam. All were subverted, because Imperialists and Settler-Colonialists require certain material conditions, and those material conditions tend towards the current state of both the US and the Black Panther Party.

It is for this very reason that I refuse to compromise with Settler-Colonialism and I regard Imperialism and Settler-Colonialism as principal contradiction

Expand full comment

No posts